Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
SENECA R-VII (073106 )
FINAL Adequate Yearly Progress**
SENECA JUNIOR HIGH 3000
Grade Span: 06 -08 Title I School:No

2010 Groups* Met
Communication Arts 5 0
Mathematics 5 2
Additional Indicator: Met
Required Action: Non Title I School Improvement Year 1
Overall Status 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Communication Arts Status
   Met Met Met Met Not Met Met Not Met Not Met        
Mathematics Status
   Not Met Not Met Met Met Met Met Not Met Not Met        
Additional Indicator Status
   Met Met Met Met Met        
COMMUNICATION ARTS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Proficiency Target 18.4 19.4 20.4 26.6 34.7 42.9 51.0 59.2 67.4 75.5 83.7 91.8 100.0
School Total (All Kids) PROF 31.6 * 47.1 *
Y 		42.3 *
Y 		37.6 *
Y 		45.7 *
Y 		40.9 *
CI 		54.6 *
Y 		58.4 *
CI 		53 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             59.3 60.1 55.9        
  LND/PR 0 0 0.8 . 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3        
Asian/Pacific Isl. PROF     .
.
50
-- 		25
-- 		0
-- 		33.3
-- 		50
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             66.7 33.3 50        
LND/PR     . . . 0 0 0 0 0        
Black PROF . 100
-- 		.
0
-- 		75
-- 		25
-- 		40
-- 		50
-- 		50
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             40 50 50        
LND/PR . 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0 0        
Hispanic PROF 0 .
.
.
50
-- 		66.7
-- 		71.4
-- 		75
-- 		50
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             85.7 75 50        
LND/PR 0 . . . . 0 0 0 0 0        
American Indian PROF 30 40.9
-- 		41.7
-- 		16
-- 		34.3 *
CI 		34 *
CI 		50.5 *
CI 		48.8 *
CI 		45.5 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             54.9 50 48.1        
LND/PR 0 0 7.7 . 0 0 0 0 0 1.3        
White PROF 33.3 * 49.5 *
Y 		42.2 *
Y 		43.4 *
Y 		49.8 *
Y 		43.5 *
Y 		56.5 *
Y 		61.6 *
Y 		55.4 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             60.4 63.5 58.6        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0.4 0 0        
Other/Non-Response PROF 0 0
-- 		50
-- 		.
.
.
.
0
-- 		.
       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             . 0 .        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . . . . . 0 .        
F/R Lunch PROF 13.6 * 36.4 *
Y 		30.4 *
Y 		21.2 *
CI 		29.4 *
CI 		28.9 *
NP 		41.7 *
S 		48.8 *
S 		40.9 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             47.9 49.4 44.3        
LND/PR 0 0 1.8 . 0 0 0 0.6 0 0.6        
IEP PROF 0 6.3
-- 		0
-- 		6.3
-- 		7.1
-- 		11.4
-- 		23.1 *
S 		17 *
NP 		15.8 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             32.7 20.8 19.3        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1.9 0 0        
LEP PROF . .
.
.
.
0
-- 		0
-- 		0
-- 		33.3
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             50 0 33.3        
LND/PR . . . . . . 0 0 0 0        
MATHEMATICS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Proficiency Target 8.3 9.3 10.3 17.5 26.6 35.8 45.0 54.1 63.3 72.5 81.7 90.8 100.0
School Total (All Kids) PROF 8.7 * 7 *
N 		9.8 *
CI 		15.5 *
CI 		46.7 *
Y 		45.1 *
Y 		52.6 *
Y 		53.9 *
CI 		53.8 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             55.9 56.2 57.1        
  LND/PR 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.3        
Asian/Pacific Isl. PROF     0
-- 		.
100
-- 		50
-- 		66.7
-- 		66.7
-- 		100
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             66.7 66.7 100        
LND/PR     0 . . 0 0 0 0 0        
Black PROF . .
.
.
75
-- 		25
-- 		40
-- 		100
-- 		50
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             60 100 50        
LND/PR . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0        
Hispanic PROF 0 0
-- 		0
-- 		.
100
-- 		0
-- 		57.1
-- 		37.5
-- 		50
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             57.1 37.5 50        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0        
American Indian PROF 0 3.7
-- 		7.1
-- 		13.3
-- 		36.3 *
Y 		36.8 *
Y 		41.8 *
CI 		41.3 *
CI 		45.5 *
SC 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             41.8 46.3 46.8        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 1.3        
White PROF 10.4 * 8 *
N 		10.6 *
Y 		15.8 *
CI 		49.6 *
Y 		48.9 *
Y 		56.3 *
Y 		58 *
Y 		56.2 *
CI 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             60.5 59.5 60.2        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0.4 0        
Other/Non-Response PROF 0 0
-- 		.
.
.
.
.
0
-- 		.
       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             . 0 .        
LND/PR 0 0 . . . . . . 0 .        
F/R Lunch PROF 5.9 * 4.3 *
N 		1.9 *
N 		13.3 *
CI 		34.8 *
Y 		34.6 *
CI 		43.3 *
CI 		47.8 *
CI 		44.9 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             46.3 49.7 48.3        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.6        
IEP PROF 0 0
-- 		0
-- 		5.3
-- 		16.7
-- 		11.4
-- 		17 *
SC 		18.9 *
NP 		21.1 *
NP 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             20.8 24.5 22.8        
LND/PR 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0        
LEP PROF . .
.
.
.
100
-- 		100
-- 		50
-- 		66.7
-- 		       
  GROWTH + PROF PCT             100 50 66.7        
LND/PR . . . . . . 0 0 0 0        
Attendance/Graduation 94.9 | 0 95.5 | 0 95.4 | 0 94.9 | 0 94.9 | 0 95 | 0 94.6 | 0 94.9 | 0 94.5 | 0          
General Notes:
School level calculations do not include students who have been in the building less than a full academic year.
District level calculations do not include students who have been in the district less than a full academic year.
To meet AYP all subgroups that met the minimum cell size requirements must have tested at least 95% of the students and must have met the Annual Proficiency Target and the additional indicator requirement.

Additional Indicator -- For both school and district reporting attendance is used at the elementary and middle levels, at the high school level graduation rate is used. (Note: District level reporting is determined by the highest grade level. K-8 uses attendance rate. K-12 uses graduation rate and K-8 attendance rate.) The requirement for MET is: Attendance Rate is equal to or greater than 93% Or shows any improvement from previous year. Graduation Rate is equal to or greater than 85% or demonstrate improvement from previous year. If the graduation rate is 75.0% to 84.9% improvement must be greater than or equal to 2%. If the graduation rate is less than 74.9% improvement must be greater than or equal to 5%.

Additional Indicator Symbols:
Y For Attendance Rate indicates that the group met the requirement based on improvement.
MY For Graduation Rate indicates that the group met the requirement based on improvement.
MYY For Graduation Rate indicates that the group met the requirement based on improvement using the group of total, indicating that the cell size was too small for that group.
NMY For Graduation Rate indicates that the group was not met, indicating that the cell size was too small for that group and the group of TOTAL was used in the determination.

Definitions:

PROF: The percent of students who are Proficient or Advanced.
LND: Level Not Determined 2007-2009 - The percent of students who did not receive an Achievement Level or did not have a valid attempt on any session of the test.
(LND 2002-2006 -- In addition to 2007-2009 definition, included students caught cheating.) The percent of students who were LND should be five percent or below.
GROWTH + PROF PCT: Is the percent of students who are Proficient or Advanced plus the percent of students who are on track using the growth calculation.

Symbols:

* Indicates the subgroup meets the minimum cell size requirements. Minimum cell size requirements: 30 for all subgroups. (For 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, IEP and LEP subgroups had a minimum cell size of 50.)
^ If there are fewer than 30 students in the school total, and State Proficiency Target was not met, the current year and two prior years are aggregated.
This only applies to the calculation for the school total, not the disaggregated groups.
@ The group Met the 95% participation using an average of current and prior year, or current year and prior two years.

AYP MET Symbols:
Y Annual Proficiency Target Met
CI Annual Proficiency Target Met with confidence interval
G Annual Proficiency Target Met using Growth
S Annual Proficiency Target Met using Safe Harbor provision
SC Annual Proficiency Target Met using the confidence interval for Safe Harbor
AYP NOT MET Symbols:
N* Annual Proficiency Target Met, but did not have a participation rate of at least 95%
NC Annual Proficiency Target Met with the confidence interval, but did not have a participation rate of at least 95%
NP Annual Proficiency Target Not Met
NN Annual Proficiency Target Not Met and participation rate was less than 95%

Final Posted October 26, 2010