Missouri School Improvement Program 2005 District Summary of Annual Performance Report 28OCT2005:00:00:00 |
|
||||||
District Name: KANSAS CITY 33 County/District Code: 048078 |
|||||||
Legend:
(See Scoring Guide for more details) |
|||||||
Scoring Guide Points: H=High AH=High(2) Y=Yearly Increase A=Average R=Rolling Average C=Combined Standard (Yes or No) M=Multiple Year Average Over the Base | Abbreviations: T=Top 2 Levels B=Bottom 2 Levels MA=Math CA=Communication Arts SC=Science SS=Social Studies #=Level Not Determined +Floor Exceeded bpts=Bonus Points *=Additional Data Required Req=only CA and MA results used NV=Less than 60 percent of students tested in voluntary subject | ||||||
Standard | Indicator | Topic | Scoring Guide Points Possible | Scoring Guide Points Required | Scoring Guide Points Earned | District Performance Standard Met |
District Overall Points |
9.1 | *1 | MAP Index-Req-Sci Grade 3-5 | 12 | 6 | TOTAL=9-Sci MA-Y=3 CA-Y=3 SC-A=3 SS-NV=0 bpts=1 |
Met | 9 |
*2 | MAP Index-Req-Sci Grade 6-8 | 12 | 6 | TOTAL=5-Sci MA-Y=3 CA-Y=0.5+ SC-A=1.5+ SS-NV=0 bpts=1 |
Met | 9 | |
*3 | MAP Index Grade 9-11 | 8 | 4 | TOTAL=0 MA-Y=0+ CA-H=0+ SC-Y=0+ SS-NV=0 bpts=2 |
Not Met | 0 | |
9.2 | *1 | Reading Index Grade 3 | 4 | 3 | H=0 AH=0 Y=3 A= 0 R= 1 | Met | 9 |
*2 | Reading Index Grade 7 | 4 | 3 | H=0 AH=0 Y=0 A=0 R=0 + | Not Met | 0 | |
9.3 | *1 | ACT | 15 | 9 | H=0 Y=0 A=0 R=0 | Not Met | 0 |
9.4 | *1 | Advanced Courses | 15 | 9 | H=12 AH=12 Y=3 R=5 C=Y | Met | 7 |
*2 | Vocational Courses | 15 | 9 | H=0 AH=0 Y=0 R=0 C=Y | Met | 7 | |
*3 | College Placement | 15 | 9 | H=0 AH=0 Y=9 R=5 C=N | Met | 7 | |
*4 | Vocational Placement | 15 | 9 | H=0 AH=0 Y=6 R=10 C=N | Met | 7 | |
10.1 | *1 | Dropout | 15 | 9 | H=0 Y=6 A=0 R=10 | Met | 9 |
GED - Bonus points on Dropout Rubric | -2 Points on 10.1*1 +3 Points or on 10.1*1 |
||||||
*2 | Attendance | 15 | 9 | H=0 Y=0 A=0 R=0 | Not Met | 0 | |
64 | |||||||
The above indicates the district status in meeting the Performance Indicators. These may be used in planning for school improvement, but they will be used to make MSIP accreditation decisions only for those districts being reviewed in 2005-2005 and for Re-review purposes. (See Supporting Data for more details.) |
Data as of 28OCT2005:00:00:00
Information Posted to the Web November 1, 2005